Leadership becomes stronger when more people learn to think, decide, and act wisely.
Imagine an organization where the leader must make every important decision. Questions travel upward because everyone expects answers from the top. People below learn to wait, ask permission, and follow instructions. The organization may look efficient while that leader is present. Yet much of its intelligence remains trapped in one place.
Now imagine another organization. Leaders still provide purpose, direction, and boundaries. But people are expected to think, question, decide, and learn. Good ideas matter regardless of who offers them. Leadership becomes less about having every answer and more about helping wisdom grow everywhere.
Open Organizations Show Us Something Important
Taylor Newman explores this kind of workplace in 3 Reasons Open Organizations are so Successful. Drawing from Jim Whitehurst's ideas, Newman highlights three qualities. Open organizations value meritocracy, welcome honest friction, and treat leaders as catalysts. Together, these qualities suggest something deeper about leadership.
Meritocracy means a good idea deserves a fair hearing. Rank does not automatically make an idea better. An intern may notice something the chief executive missed. Experience still matters, but position does not guarantee understanding. Opening the organization to ideas expands what the organization can see.
Honest friction adds another ingredient. People need enough safety to disagree and point out mistakes. Constant agreement may feel pleasant, but it can hide weak thinking. Respectful disagreement exposes assumptions and invites better questions. The goal is not conflict, but better understanding.
Then comes the leader as catalyst. The leader provides direction and gets things moving. But the leader does not make every decision. Other people receive responsibility for parts of the work. They become participants in thinking, not merely hands completing assigned tasks.
Delegating Work Is Not Enough
Many leaders already delegate tasks. They tell people what needs doing and assign responsibility. Yet the important decisions may still remain at the top. The hands become distributed while the thinking remains centralized.
That creates a hidden dependency. People may become excellent at carrying out instructions. Yet they get little practice making difficult decisions. When unfamiliar situations appear, everything travels upward again. The organization becomes limited by the judgment of a few people.
Strong leadership goes further. It creates room for people to exercise judgment themselves. They receive enough information, authority, and responsibility to act. They also experience the consequences of their decisions. That is where deeper learning begins.
Judgment Is Practiced, Wisdom Is Grown
This distinction matters.
Judgment helps us decide what to do. Wisdom asks what should be done and why. It considers consequences, relationships, values, experience, and purpose. Good judgment is therefore an important part of wisdom.
But wisdom cannot simply be handed to someone. A leader cannot distribute wisdom like assignments or budgets. People develop it through repeated encounters with reality. They decide, act, observe what happens, and learn.
The process might look like this.
Purpose → Responsibility → Action → Feedback → Learning → Better Judgment → Growing Wisdom
Someone receives real responsibility. That person makes a decision and acts. Reality responds, sometimes as expected and sometimes differently. Those consequences create feedback. Reflection can then turn feedback into learning.
Over time, better judgment becomes possible. Repeated often enough, this cycle can slowly develop wisdom.
Leaders Create the Conditions
This changes how we understand leadership.
The leader need not remain the organization's permanent source of wisdom. The deeper task is creating conditions where wisdom can grow. That means giving people meaningful responsibility within clear purpose and boundaries. It also means letting reality become part of the teacher.
People need honest feedback, not protection from every uncomfortable truth. They need room to question ideas, including ideas from leaders. They need enough authority to turn understanding into action. Then they need opportunities to learn from what follows.
This does not mean everyone decides everything. Some decisions require specialized knowledge or wider agreement. Authority still matters, and accountability remains necessary. An open organization should not become a confused organization.
The real challenge is deciding where judgment should live. Decisions should sit close enough to reality for local knowledge to matter. Shared risks may still require shared judgment. Good leaders distribute authority without abandoning responsibility.
Feedback Turns Experience Into Learning
Giving people authority alone does not produce wisdom.
Someone can repeat the same mistake for twenty years. Experience becomes valuable when we learn from it. Organizations therefore need feedback that shows what actually happened. Otherwise, experience can simply reinforce old habits.
Every decision produces consequences. Those consequences reveal something about the assumptions behind the decision. Sometimes the original idea works. Sometimes reality exposes something nobody noticed before.
The important response is not automatically defending the decision. It is asking what happened and what can be learned.
This changes how we understand failure. A disappointing result does not always mean someone acted foolishly. Sometimes failure reveals information that was unavailable earlier. A healthy organization asks what reality taught before deciding what should change.
That makes thoughtful experimentation more useful. People can try reasonable actions within clear boundaries. Results become evidence. Evidence improves understanding. Better understanding improves the next decision.
An Organization Can Become Wiser
This may be the deeper promise of an open organization.
Its advantage is not simply happier employees. It is not merely faster decisions or greater participation. Those benefits may occur, but the larger possibility is distributed learning. More people become capable of noticing, questioning, deciding, acting, and adapting.
The organization then depends less on exceptional individuals. Knowledge spreads through experience, conversation, and relationships. People become more capable because they participate in real decisions. Leadership begins appearing in more places.
That creates resilience.
When circumstances change, people do not always need instructions from above. They can observe what is happening and respond within their responsibilities. When something exceeds their authority, they know wider judgment is needed. The organization becomes both distributed and connected.
Leadership That Outlives the Leader
This gives us another way to measure leadership.
We often judge leaders by what happened while they were in charge. We should also ask what became possible because they were there. Did people become better thinkers and decision makers? Did the organization become better at learning?
A leader who solves every problem may appear indispensable. But indispensability can hide weakness. The organization remains dependent upon one person's judgment. When that person leaves, much of the capability may leave too.
A stronger leader leaves something different behind.
People know how to think together. They can disagree without destroying relationships. They can make decisions within clear responsibilities. They can learn from consequences and revise what no longer works.
The leader has not merely created followers.
The leader has helped create more capable people.
That may be one of leadership's most important achievements. Do not make yourself the place where every answer must be found. Build the conditions where people can encounter reality, exercise judgment, learn from consequences, and grow.
The best leaders do not try to become the wisest person in every room.
They build organizations where wisdom can grow.
Source Credit
Inspired by Taylor Newman, 3 Reasons Open Organizations are so Successful, published on Medium, September 28, 2017. Newman discusses meritocracy, honest friction, and leaders acting as catalysts, drawing from Jim Whitehurst's The Open Organization.
Tags
#Leadership #Organizational_Culture #Management #Decision_Making #Wisdom
No comments:
Post a Comment