Why the Economy Grows the Wrong Thing
What Polanyi, Ostrom, and Pagel Help Us See Clearly
The Problem We Feel but Struggle to Explain
Most people can feel that something is off.
The economy is growing. Numbers go up. Buildings rise. Technology improves. Yet everyday life does not feel easier. Homes are harder to afford. Energy feels expensive. Communities feel weaker.
It creates a strange question: how can a system grow so much, yet deliver so little where it matters?
The answer is simple, but not obvious.
The economy is growing the wrong thing.
Karl Polanyi: Markets Should Serve Society
Karl Polanyi helps us see the first mistake.
He argued that markets were never meant to run society. They were tools, not masters. But over time, we flipped the relationship. We started shaping society to serve markets instead.
When that happens, things that should never be treated like products—land, labor, and even human relationships—get pulled into the market machine.
Think of it like using a measuring tape as a hammer. It was never designed for that job. The more you force it, the more damage it causes.
When land becomes just a commodity, housing becomes expensive. When labor becomes just a cost, people become replaceable. When money becomes a product, it starts extracting value instead of supporting life.
That is where the system begins to drift away from human needs.
Elinor Ostrom: People Can Govern What They Share
Elinor Ostrom showed that this is not the only way.
For years, experts believed shared resources would always fail. They assumed people would act selfishly and destroy what they shared.
Ostrom went into the real world and found the opposite.
Communities can manage shared resources well—if they design the right rules.
These rules are simple but powerful:
- People know who belongs and what is being shared
- Rules are shaped by the people who use the resource
- Members watch and support each other
- Conflicts are resolved quickly and fairly
- Small groups connect into larger networks when needed
This works because people are not just selfish individuals. They are also capable of trust, cooperation, and care.
Think of a neighborhood well. If no one talks, it gets overused. But if the community sets rules together, the well can last for generations.
Ostrom’s insight is clear: governance does not need to come only from markets or governments. It can come from communities themselves.
Mark Pagel: Cooperation Is How Humans Win
Mark Pagel adds another layer.
He explains that humans succeed not because we are the strongest or fastest, but because we cooperate better than any other species.
We share knowledge. We build together. We pass ideas across generations.
That is our real advantage.
But modern systems often reward the opposite behavior. They reward extraction, competition, and short-term gain.
It is like training a team to compete against each other instead of working together. You weaken the very strength that made the team successful in the first place.
When cooperation breaks down, progress slows. When cooperation is supported, progress accelerates.
Where the System Breaks
When we combine these three ideas, the problem becomes clearer.
- Markets have grown too powerful and now shape society
- Communities have been pushed aside, even though they can manage resources well
- Cooperation, our strongest trait, is often discouraged instead of supported
This creates a system that extracts value instead of building it.
Money flows out of communities instead of circulating within them. Ownership concentrates instead of spreading. People pay constantly but rarely gain lasting security.
It feels like running on a treadmill. You move, but you do not arrive.
A Different Direction: Build Around Use, Not Extraction
If the system is designed, it can be redesigned.
The shift is simple in principle: move from extraction to reciprocity.
Instead of treating payments as pure consumption, treat them as participation.
This is where ideas like community ownership and Fair Points become practical.
When people pay for housing, energy, or water, part of that payment should build ownership. Over time, users become owners. Wealth stays where it is created.
This aligns with how real communities already work when they succeed.
It is the difference between renting a tool forever and slowly buying it together.
Growing the Right Thing
A healthy economy should grow things that matter:
- Security, not just transactions
- Ownership, not just access
- Cooperation, not just competition
- Local strength, not just global scale
This does not mean rejecting markets. It means placing them back in their proper role—as tools that serve society.
It also means recognizing that communities are not weak. They are capable systems of governance when given the right structure.
And it means remembering that cooperation is not idealistic. It is practical. It is how humans actually succeed.
Closing
The economy is not a force of nature. It is a system we designed.
Right now, it is optimized to grow financial returns, even when that comes at the cost of real life.
But the thinkers we explored point to a different path.
Design systems where people who use assets can own them.
Design rules that communities can shape and enforce.
Design incentives that reward cooperation instead of extraction.
When we do that, growth starts to mean something again.
It stops being about bigger numbers and starts being about better lives.
Key Takeaways
- The economy feels broken because it is growing the wrong things
- Markets were meant to serve society, not control it
- Communities can successfully manage shared resources with the right rules
- Human progress depends on cooperation, not just competition
- Current systems often extract wealth instead of building it locally
- Shifting payments into ownership can keep wealth within communities
- A better economy grows security, ownership, and cooperation
Inspiration
Inspired by Polanyi, Ostrom, Pagel, Bregman and Adam Smith by Kevin Cox
and The Economy Is Growing the Wrong Thing by OMS53
Comments